A hunt began yesterday to determine an unknown, 8ft actor v a barrel chest that looks an excellent in shaggy makeup. It was motivated by a film executive who gave away what is well-known in the trade as "Warner Brothers" big secret" - how they make Hagrid so huge in the an initial Harry Potter film.

You are watching: How did they make hagrid look so big

Tanya Seghatchian, co-producer of the Potter films, let on slide to one audience of youngsters at the Guardian Hay festival the "there were two Hagrids and also two sets. One Hagrid to be big, one small".

Ms Seghatchian made clean in breakthrough that she walk not want to talk about the one-of-a-kind effect. Yet she was calm in former of the audience come answer the an important next question: "Does this median that the 6ft 4in Robbie Coltrane is the small Hagrid?" She replied: "Yes."

Since only Coltrane is attributed in the cast list, this means that somewhere in britain lurks an ultra-huge, ultra-modest actor, who looks qualified of damaging down doors and is great enough at his arts to utter the favourite catchphrase of bother Potter and also the Philosopher"s Stone: "I shouldn"t have actually said that."

As multiple sclerosis Seghatchian made clean in reply to questions, partly from children and partly from the festival director, Peter Florence, the expression was composed by scriptwriters, no by the writer JK Rowling.

But, because that the children, she favourite revelation was the Peeves, the incurably embittered and resourceful poltergeist who was dropped from Philosopher"s Stone, has actually been reprieved.

Bowing to kid protests, he has actually been consisted of to wreak his vengeance on hogwarts castle in the next film, harry Potter and also the chamber of Secrets.

Trying to justification the omission, she said: "Peeves will appear in future films. He was not an essential to the story." grandfather Florence asked whether that expected Peeves"s fellow-spectre almost Headless Nick - who was in the very first film - was an essential to the story? No, acknowledged Ms Seghatchian gracefully "but nearly Headless Nick was man Cleese, and also we every love man Cleese more".

Reaction native the youngsters made the clear the their grandparents could love the maestro of Monty Python"s paris Circus. Yet they loved Peeves an ext because his stock in profession in the books is to feeling unloved, as kids themselves periodically do.

Asked by mr Florence if rights for the Potter stories were the most profitable film franchise due to the fact that James Bond, ms Seghatchian said: "Yes, but we need to go on do it occupational for girlfriend ."

Among other keys she revealed to the children were:

· what in the bird people is an unfortunate owl who insists on rolling on come his back. For a sequence in the film, he was trained to paris in, provide a letter to Harry, then roll on come his back. "Now that he"s excellent that, the still rolls over," multiple sclerosis Seghatchian said.

· hogwart castle and also the Quiddich stadion existed just as computer simulations.

· However, the dwarves in the financial institution in Diagon Alley, the wizards" secret London street, were played by real dwarves "with lots of makeup and also heads the we constructed on".

See more: Set Clock On Bose Wave Radio, Bose Wave Radio Ii Owner'S Manual

· The letters which fly down chimneys and also through letter crate in Privet drive were real. "We put big powerful pan behind holes in the house, climate threw letters in former of the fans. It to be very, an extremely simple, but it worked. That is so much more exciting than once it is constructed on a computer."

Ms Seghatchian warned her audience the if they insisted on films packed through magic, computer systems would have to be supplied "more and also more" and the strength of old fashioned special impacts would be lost.